[unhappy thoughts redacted] it will be working again [unhappy thoughts redacted] Lots, I'll bet. [unhappy thoughts redacted] Come on everyone [unhappy thoughts redacted] |
[unhappy thoughts redacted] it will be working again [unhappy thoughts redacted] Lots, I'll bet. [unhappy thoughts redacted] Come on everyone [unhappy thoughts redacted] |
Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here
By RSS:Markdown Basics
Question tags:
question asked: 22 Nov '10, 10:54
question was seen: 1,716 times
last updated: 18 Mar '11, 12:52
Breck, IMHO, this is not a question, but an unhelpful rant, barely better than other rants you have recently been directing me to read.
Ooops, sorry, forgot to plug in my Sunshine and Lollipops module this morning... it won't happen again!
@Everyone: You see, according to the tags, Breck is debugging (whatever) – don't you have a thorough understanding for a lot of "to-be redacted speech" done during a hard search for errors?
@Breck: While I thought your redacted comment was a rant, you do raise a valid point for Sybase...namely that our SYSTEMS HAVE TO WORK. On that point, there can be no argument, and it is absolutely fair to point out when they don't, and not all problems are Sybase IT. Sometimes, the problem is the system itself. It is our job to fix them, and make them more reliable and better performing.
@Chris: I agree with Breck - in case he still holds the point:) - that DCX could perform better. I consider it a very convenient, helpful and innovative tool but the performance is not that good.
Now that the group hug is out of the way :) I thought I'd add that we also see the slowdown on initial load (per browser session) of the framework and are investigating improvements. We're seeing great times on DCX once framework is loaded, but are also investigating whether response times are different during the night or early morning, as some users have encountered temporary sluggishness at those times.