The forum will be down for maintenance at some point from Friday, November 16 at 19:00 EDT until Sunday, November 18 at 23:59 EDT. Downtime will be minimized but the exact timing is unknown.

The numbers shown at Crypto++ 5.6.0 Benchmarks seem to indicate that SHA256 is the fastest of the choices available with SQL Anywhere 12's HASH function... is that true? (there is occasionally a [cough] gap [cough] 'twixt theory and practice)

I'm interested in raw speed for computing string fingerprints, not cryptographic strength.

asked 05 Aug '12, 11:06

Breck%20Carter's gravatar image

Breck Carter
28.1k477636916
accept rate: 20%


I think CRC32 ought to be fastest, then MD5. (I'm not quite sure what the columns are in that benchmark table, but it looks to me like they are confirming this.)

permanent link

answered 17 Aug '12, 10:17

Tim%20McClements's gravatar image

Tim McClements
2.0k1829
accept rate: 36%

I think you're right, SHA256 is the slowest, not the fastest.

(20 Aug '12, 12:19) Breck Carter
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×253

question asked: 05 Aug '12, 11:06

question was seen: 899 times

last updated: 21 Aug '12, 11:14