There's a contradiction according to the "Heartbleed" fixes between the information in this FAQ and the newest 12.0.1.4104 EBF readme: From Jason's statement in the FAQ answer:
In contrast, the 12.0.1.4104 EBF readme (and the according CR) does name different affected versions:
Question: asked 19 May '14, 03:38 Volker Barth |
Hm, as Jason has added here:
So, I would conclude the EBF readme note seems to be more up-to-date... answered 26 May '14, 10:13 Volker Barth |
There is also an updated CR to reflect the additional changes needed - see CR #764130. answered 26 May '14, 10:52 Jeff Albion |
Presumably the 16.0.0.1824 EBF for Windows has the Heartbleed fix. Alas, the associated read-me file does not contain any mention of it (no mention of Engineering Case #761751, no references AT ALL to ANY changes made in build 1824).
I suspect the Evil Prince Haste is to blame :)