Should I move asa9 database to sa11 or forward to sa12?

  • About 110gb
  • Grows about 50mb/day
  • Web app (kind of internet banking)
  • About 1k concurrent users on website
  • About 100 concurrent

Licence isn't a problem, since we have both (9, 11 and 12).

asked 29 Sep '11, 21:45

Zote's gravatar image

Zote
1.7k364050
accept rate: 43%


It seems to be the common observation here that both 11.0.1 and 12.0.1 look "stable enough".

So I would check whether there are

  1. discontinued features in v12.0.1 that still exist in v11.0.1 and are relevant to you and
  2. new features in v12.0.1 that seem useful (for productional usage)

I guess these are the points that will influence both your initial porting expenses and the possible coming savings/advantages by means of "better features" (easier/lesser to code, more opportiunities, whatever).

permanent link

answered 30 Sep '11, 06:57

Volker%20Barth's gravatar image

Volker Barth
30.6k306456662
accept rate: 32%

Would you run Windows Vista even though Windows 7 is far superior?

permanent link

answered 29 Sep '11, 23:06

Calvin%20Allen's gravatar image

Calvin Allen
1.5k232638
accept rate: 25%

And "Window 7" seems quite stable to me ;-)

(30 Sep '11, 03:04) Martin
1

I would recommend v12.01, too, - nevertheless, v11 does not deserve a "Vista-like" (i.e. not so positive) notion IMHO.

SQL Anywhere has delivered solid versions for years (well, can't tell for v6 and v7 as I have skipped them...).

(30 Sep '11, 03:45) Volker Barth
1

well, going directly to v12 will "kill two bugs with one hit", thus you will save one migration going 9->12 instead of 9->11->12.. We have lots of customers migrated to v1201 and its very stable, but also some still hanging on v9 or v10, who dont want to upgrade at all, because of superior stability. Its hard to say, but once you have to migrate to a supported version, I would recommend to go v12, as v11 is the next one to be obsoleted. On the other hand, consider lots of changes before each two verions, thus there is definitely more changes to watch out betwwen 9-12 than with 9-11 = possible more work.. :)

(30 Sep '11, 05:00) marchello
Replies hidden
1

V10 is still fully supported... FWIW 10.0.1 for Windows had an EBF in June 2011 which is two months after the most recent 12.0.1 EBF for Linux.

(30 Sep '11, 05:06) Breck Carter
1

yep, correct, v10 will retire Jan 2012. migration path is planned to v12, so I guess that counts double for v9 ;)

(30 Sep '11, 05:29) marchello

... though I remember some discussions here that have lead to bugfixes for v11 and v12 - and that were deliberately not ported to the v10 codebase because of its limited status...

(That's no critism, and I'm fine with these decisions, it's just an observation that "limited status" does have a meaning...)

(30 Sep '11, 06:44) Volker Barth

Actually our DB server runs on Windows 2003. We are planning to move it to Windows 2008.

(30 Sep '11, 09:51) Zote
showing 5 of 7 show all flat view
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×412
×137
×98
×45

question asked: 29 Sep '11, 21:45

question was seen: 1,192 times

last updated: 30 Sep '11, 09:51