The forum will experience an outage sometime between February 10 at 7:00pm EST and February 12 at 11:59 EST for installation of security updates. The actual time and duration of the outage are unknown but attempts will be made to minimize the downtime. We apologize for any inconvenience.

I use an application that connects to a SqlAnywhere 11 server/database by issuing the following command (taken from the ConsoleLogFile):

<,3,EXEC_IMM,START DATABASE 'database-file.DBF' AS
Starting database "database-name" (database-file.DBF) at Tue Nov 04 2014 09:42
Database recovery in progress
    Last checkpoint at Mon Sep 29 2014 13:05
    Checkpoint log...
    Transaction log: database-file.DBF.TLG...
Error: Cannot open transaction log file -- The system cannot find the file specified.
Recovery complete
E,3,-106,Cannot open transaction log file -- database-file.DBF.TLG
Database "UTILITY_DB" (UTILITY_DB) stopped at Tue Nov 04 2014 09:42

I'd like to emulate the way the application issues the START DATABASE command but can't figure out how to execute with EXEC_IMM (I'm assuming this is EXECUTE IMMEDIATE?) when logged into the UTILTIY_DB as DBA; I can only seem to execute with PREPARE (e.g., <,3,EXEC_IMM,START DATABASE...).

Most importantly I'd like to prevent a ROLLBACK after the recovery. I tried starting the server and database with the -f command, but it then complains about the database needing recovery.

So, how do I execute unprepared statements and/or prevent rollbacks on errors?

asked 04 Nov '14, 16:36

davidmurdoch's gravatar image

accept rate: 0%

edited 05 Nov '14, 15:06

What exact problem are you facing - what's the link between START DATABASE and a rollback? Are you trying to start a database and that should not have an impact on the current transaction? (I don't know if it does, at least START DATABASE should not do an auto-commit.)

Just as a general hint: There are several ways to prevent an impact of operations on the current transaction, e.g.:

  • put these operations within a savepoint than can be rollbacked without "disturbing" the surrounding transaction
  • use an event to execute these operations and start that event from the current transaction: as events run on their own connection, they use a separate transaction by design
  • put these operations within a separate transaction (though that necessarily means the current transaction must be committed beforehad unless you use a separate connection).

(05 Nov '14, 03:22) Volker Barth

I asked a similar question related to this issue on StackOverflow: I'll update this question with more details in a moment

(05 Nov '14, 15:05) davidmurdoch

If the goal is to prevent a ROLLBACK of uncommitted transactions at the last time the database went down, the short answer is that you can't.

The long answer is that even if you could, you'd have to deal with potential database issues like check constraints and referential integrity (specifically if wait_for_commit is used). However, you may be able to regain some of this data by applying translated SQL for those uncommitted transactions against the database manually.

permanent link

answered 05 Nov '14, 16:05

Tyson%20Lewis's gravatar image

Tyson Lewis
accept rate: 22%


If you believe you have a big transaction that didn't complete you could always pull out the details from the transaction log using the dbtran utility. See dbtran -s -a to get at the SQL (and then change the rollback to be a commit and resubmit after the database recovers.

(05 Nov '14, 17:58) Nick Elson S...
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 04 Nov '14, 16:36

question was seen: 459 times

last updated: 05 Nov '14, 17:58