The forum will be down for maintenance over the weekend of August 18-20, 2017. The forum will be shut down on the evening (EDT) of Friday, August 18. Downtime is unknown but may be up to two days. The forum will be restarted as soon as maintenance is complete.

From a performance perspective what is the better approach for huge tables:

using OR or using IN like in

select * from table where a = 1 or a = 2; 
select * from table where a in (1,2)

asked 30 Oct '12, 07:15

Martin's gravatar image

accept rate: 14%

AFAIK, they are semantically equivalent and should be rewritten in the same way.

Cf. page 10 from this excellent whitepaper by Ani:

Query Processing Based on SQL Anywhere 12.0.1 Architecture, as referenced in this doc page.

permanent link

answered 30 Oct '12, 07:25

Volker%20Barth's gravatar image

Volker Barth
accept rate: 32%

I thought so too (equivalent) anyway in real world I see totally different plans which are used...

Thanks for the link, I wasn't aware of this paper!

(30 Oct '12, 07:28) Martin
Replies hidden

Well, I'd just noticed it today and really like to share that link:)

(30 Oct '12, 07:47) Volker Barth

Can't say for sure in SQL Anywhere database, but you can check this link for a general behavior.

permanent link

answered 01 Nov '12, 07:47

Gandalf's gravatar image

accept rate: 50%

Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text]( "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:


question asked: 30 Oct '12, 07:15

question was seen: 912 times

last updated: 01 Nov '12, 07:47