The numbers shown at Crypto++ 5.6.0 Benchmarks seem to indicate that SHA256 is the fastest of the choices available with SQL Anywhere 12's HASH function... is that true? (there is occasionally a [cough] gap [cough] 'twixt theory and practice)

I'm interested in raw speed for computing string fingerprints, not cryptographic strength.

asked 05 Aug '12, 11:06

Breck%20Carter's gravatar image

Breck Carter
27.4k424585836
accept rate: 21%


I think CRC32 ought to be fastest, then MD5. (I'm not quite sure what the columns are in that benchmark table, but it looks to me like they are confirming this.)

permanent link

answered 17 Aug '12, 10:17

Tim%20McClements's gravatar image

Tim McClements
1.8k1825
accept rate: 35%

I think you're right, SHA256 is the slowest, not the fastest.

(20 Aug '12, 12:19) Breck Carter
Your answer
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported

Question tags:

×241

question asked: 05 Aug '12, 11:06

question was seen: 700 times

last updated: 21 Aug '12, 11:14